Supplied by anonymous up north with minor editing and appending.
In our Search for the truth, we find what has been suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check this out and they said it was false and there were no such dockets. So, I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it: Snopes lied.
Every one of those dockets is there. So, here is what I wrote Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.
Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future.
That being said, I’ll bet you didn’t know this:
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on . . . Once again the US Senate sold us out!
Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. . . . Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied, of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper. Doesn’t it?
The American people mean nothing any longer. It’s all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket. You can look up some of these hearings and guess what? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
Now, compare these to Snopes’ accounting here:
What’s your opinion? Do you think Snopes lied? Why?
Feel free to post your opinion.
Wow. I’ve long known that psychologists aren’t that bright, but this takes the cake.
Snopes’s claim was that none of the cases HAD TO DO WITH ELIGIBILITY. It did not say that Kagan had never represented Obama. (Which would be a truly silly claim, since as Solicitor General, THAT WAS HER JOB.)
I don’t know who you are nor do I know how to take your remarks; nonetheless, I welcome you to explain yourself and what you mean, what your intentions are. In other words, make a little more sense and I will respond. I am neither a psychologist nor a mind reader.
PS Might Snopes be under or at times act under the aegis of the CIA? After all, it is common knowledge that FaceBook is under the same.